Whether we want it or not, we are constantly thinking about the future and preparing accordingly. Our currents thoughts and actions are tightly intertwined with the conclusions we draw based on the predictions about our own future selves. Hence, sharpening the quality of our future-predictions can save us hours, days, or even decades of suffering and instead make our current – and future – selves more effective in the world.

Going regularly outside your zone of comfort is necessary to expand your being, experience positive emotions and prevent stagnation. But it is not sufficient – you also need to ensure that going into the realm of chaos prepared, with a sword, on which your values are inscribed. Indeed, going into the zone of discomfort should be in service of a value you hold and the time and effort you spend in that zone should be proportional to the value’s importance in your life – that way you avoid going into the realm of chaos, where anxiety awaits, without a chance for acquiring anything of lasting worth.

...starting from the observations that experientially we are quickly and enigmatically able to ‘click’ with and relate to specific people, I argue that it’s possible to have that experience with any one and any experience. In the case of people with whom we resonate deeply, the experiences are already well-matched, while in other circumstances we have to scale our own experiences to match theirs. This scaling inevitably introduces noise in our capacity to effectively empathize but with patience and perseverance, we can better calibrate our scaling ability and thus become better at empathizing with one another.

One distinctive feature we have as a species is that we know of the existence of the future and can plan accordingly. It was obvious to me from the start of my degree that there would be a lot of pressure to find a career after graduating, so I took steps to alleviate that. I explored different career paths to find my spark and adopted a proactive and humble attitude. These steps facilitated the process of developing key skills that would increase my career capital in the long term. For me, this is a liberating conclusion: adopting a mindset, based on the three lessons highlighted in this meditation, can make my future self's life just a little bit easier.

Hence, within a broader view of books and reading, book summaries find their place. This renders reading purists’ militant rejection of book summaries as a source of knowledge equivalent to throwing away the baby with the bathwater.

This summary is done as a slideshow as it's easier to follow and reference.

I have simply found people that I resonate with and I would like to grow with by using their knowledge and expertise. This is an echo chamber that is worth being in.

In an analysis of contemporary culture, Jonathan Haidt and Greg Lukianoff demonstrate how contradictions to ancient wisdom and modern research have prevailed in recent years and have produced dire consequences such as an increase in violence and cognitive distortions. These contradictions they call the three Great Untruths: ‘What doesn’t kill you makes you stronger’, ‘Always trust your feelings’, ‘Life is a battle between good people and evil people’.

All in all, the book offers great psychological insights into our psyche. It encourages us to regularly take stock of our multiple selves and deeper, hidden, sometimes ugly, parts of ourselves. A dialogue with our Shadow can drive us to live an integrated, wholesome life. Adopted on a global scale, Shadow work will inevitably, in my opinion, lead to a better humanity, a better society, a better world.

All in all, despite minor limitations, the Matthew Walker’s Why We Sleep is one of those rare books that contains the sine qua non of good writing – it changes the way you view the world.

When I reflect on Marcus Aurelius’ meditations on what it means to live a good life, it seems to me that despite the fact that Marcus' answer is millennia-old, we haven't got much closer to a better answer than he did. We still know that living according to your nature will bring you great happiness; we've further explored our minds' capacities; now, we quantifiably know that authenticity, mindfulness, reflections and truth can increase one's satisfaction and fulfilment and we've seen cultures for whom death is indeed treated as a rite of passage and something to be celebrated. Yet, we still seem to struggle in the practice of such 'obvious' truths...

That other people lie is not surprising to anyone. What is less acknowledged is the fact that all too often we also lie to ourselves. Therefore, a better understanding of why self-deception occurs is pressing. Unfortunately, philosophical debates, such as that surrounding the dual representation paradox, have stumbled scientific advancements for too long and it’s high time to break the vicious cycle. VH&T break the shackles of endless, abstract arguments and lay out an empirically-driven approach to self-deception in an attempt to stimulate research from biologists, biological mathematicians, evolutionary psychologist and others. Although some important aspects of this new proposal are being called into question, such as the costs and evolutionary stability of self-deception, it remains a valuable theory that accounts for a wide range of findings and makes testable predictions. Call it self-deception but I believe that VH&T’s theory lays out the foundation for a complete understanding of self-deception.

But then again, what if there are universal truths to be known? Physics and mathematics, among other disciplines, are deeply concerned with finding universals and explaining everything in neat equations. Are their efforts in vain? The position you take to the above two problems will give you an answer to that one too.

Through radical claims you push the boundaries of knowledge. Integrating and reconciling those radical claims is how you establish the foundations of knowledge.

Sheldrake’s The Science Delusion (2013) is an ambitious challenge to the materialistic mindset, deeply embedded in the current scientific worldview. The book itself comes as a provocative response to Richard Dawkins’ The God Delusion, which made the case for science as an objective, all-knowing way to access the material reality. Sheldrake, a Christian himself, in turn, argues that such a materialistic view of science is restraining and dogmatic. One of the worst dogmas which underlies all others, a meta-dogma, if you will, is that science has everything figured out and we just need to work out the details.

Any sufficiently expressive2 math system is either incomplete or inconsistent and any consistent math system cannot prove its consistency. In other words, the theorem says that not all true statements in mathematics have proof.

I took advice from people who were better. I started watching my own games and studying my mistakes. I invested a lot of time and effort. Gradually, I was even changing my mindset to think like the professionals whose gameplay I was trying to imitate. Essentially, I changed myself to win more games and become better at the game. Here are the key lessons I learned throughout my gaming years...

Harris utilizes a careful scientific analysis of the concepts of consciousness and the self to make three strong points: 1) Consciousness is the one thing in the world that cannot be an illusion; 2) The Self is an illusion; 3) Consciousness and its contents are the only things that matter when it comes to achieving wellbeing.

This is where the confusion lies between determinism (which we’ve established is true) and fatalism (the kind of thinking “If everything is determined, why should I do anything?”) – it is still a matter of choice, albeit determined at the most fundamental level.